Third Party: Forest Practices Board
APPEAL NO. 1997-FOR-31

This was an appeal of a contravention determination and administrative penalty determination regarding unauthorized harvesting. The Board participated in the appeal solely on the issue of due diligence, arguing that it was not available as a defence to an administrative penalty for a contravention of section 96 of the Code. The FAC agreed and stated, consistent with previous appeal decisions, that due diligence to avoid a contravention is not a defence, but is a relevant consideration when determining the amount of penalty. It confirmed the contravention, but reduced the penalty amount.

Appeal allowed in part.

FAC Decision: http://www.fac.gov.bc.ca/forestPracCode/1997for31.pdf

The Board conducts its work throughout British Columbia, and we respectfully acknowledge the territories of the many Indigenous Peoples who have lived on these lands since time immemorial.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram