Third Party: Forest Practices Board
APPEAL NO. 2004-FOR-013 (a)

The appeal issue was in regard to the burden of proof for unauthorized harvesting. The appellant argued that government must prove “beyond a reasonable doubt” that the licensee was the one who cut wood without permission. The FAC confirmed that the burden of proof is the civil standard of “balance of probabilities,” and found the evidence of contravention to be compelling.

Appeal dismissed.

FAC Decision: http://www.fac.gov.bc.ca/forestPracCode/2004for013a.pdf

The Board conducts its work throughout British Columbia, and we respectfully acknowledge the territories of the many Indigenous Peoples who have lived on these lands since time immemorial.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram