Third Party: Forest Practices Board 1997-FOR-13 The appeal issue was in regard to the sufficiency of evidence and the standard of proof required to find a contravention of unauthorized harvesting under section 96 of the Code. The Board argued, and the FAC accepted, that the correct standard of proof to be applied to administrative penalties under the Code is the civil standard of proof, consistent with the FAC’s decisions in previous appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

FAC Decision: http://www.fac.gov.bc.ca/forestPracCode/1997for13.pdf

The Board conducts its work throughout British Columbia, and we respectfully acknowledge the territories of the many Indigenous Peoples who have lived on these lands since time immemorial.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram