Salvage Logging after a Wildfire at Sitkum Creek

In 2007, a wildfire burned in the Sitkum Creek Watershed, near Nelson. The Ministry of Forests and Range (MFR) has approved salvage harvesting of fire-damaged timber in the watershed, to begin in late May 2009. The salvage harvesting is aimed at recovering damaged timber, but is also to address conditions that could lead to a spruce bark beetle outbreak.

In February 2009, the Forest Practices Board received a complaint from a resident of the Sitkum Creek alluvial fan – an area prone to debris flooding. The complainant believes that the MFR has not sufficiently taken into account the increased risk to life, property and water quality created by the fire and posed by the proposed salvage logging. When faced with the prospect of salvage harvesting, the complainant would rather accept the potential consequences of a possible spruce bark beetle infestation than any additional risk posed by harvesting. In addition, the complainant is not convinced that there is a strong, scientific rationale for harvesting to address the spruce bark beetle.

The district manager believes that, if nothing is done about the beetle infestation, the risk to downstream resources may eventually be greater than the risk associated with salvage harvesting the cutblock.

North Canyon Improvement District

The North Canyon Improvement District submitted a complaint to the Forest Practices Board on March 16, 2009. The complainant said that the local community forest agreement holder, Creston Valley Forest Corporation (the licensee):

  • had not properly consulted the complainant about forest activities proposed in Camp Run Creek; and
  • had not complied with its forest stewardship plan strategies or a higher-level plan objective for logging in that consumptive-use watershed.

The complainant was also concerned that the Forest Planning and Practices Regulation under the Forest and Range Practices Act does not protect the complainant from risk and liability should logging activities result in an adverse impact to its water source.

North Canyon Improvement District

Audit of Forest Planning and Practices in the Kootenay Lake Forest District: Creston Valley Forest Corporation – FL A54214

In summer 2008, the Forest Practices Board conducted a compliance audit of forest planning and practices of the Creston Valley Forest Corporation (CVFC) in the Kootenay Lake Forest District.

The audit examined planning, field activities and obligations in the areas of: operational planning (including forest stewardship plans and site plans, where applicable); timber harvesting; road construction and maintenance; silviculture; and fire protection.

These activities were assessed for compliance with the Forest and Range Practices Act, the Wildfire Act and related regulations, as well as certain transitional elements of the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act. All activities, planning and obligations for the period June 1, 2007, to June 10, 2008, were included in the scope of the audit.

Creston Valley Forest Corp – FL A54214 in the Kootenay Lake District

Closing Letter: Wardner Woodlot

The Forest Practices Board received a complaint about forest practices on a woodlot near Wardner, BC. The Board has investigated and this is its report.

The complaintant identified several concerns with practices on the woodlot:

  1. that the woodlot licensee was leaving large debris piles in the woodlot;
  2. that there were water control issues on some roads; and
  3. that there was considerable debris left on the ground following logging in the woodlot.

Board staff visited the woodlot on November 17, 2008. Also in attendance were the complaintant and Ministry of Forests and Range (MFR) staff from the Rocky Mountain Forest District. The following are the Board’s observations and findings.

Closing Letter – Wardner Woodlot

Harrop-Procter Community Forest and Kaslo & District Community Forest Society

Audit of Forest Planning and Practices in the Kootenay Lake Forest District: Harrop-Procter Community Forest and Kaslo & District Community Forest Society

As part of its 2008 compliance audit program, the Forest Practices Board randomly selected the Kootenay Lake Forest District as the location for a full scope compliance audit, with a focus on community tenures. Within the district, the Board selected the Harrop‐Procter Community Forest and the Kaslo and District Community Forest Society for audit.

Information about the Board’s compliance audit process is provided in Appendix 1.

Pilot Audit of Soil Conservation in the Columbia Forest District